MICRO-46 Davis Survey Results Released

The survey of participants of MICRO-46 is out!

Questions included:

  1. What was your overall impression of MICRO?
  2. What was your impression of the MICRO Workshops and Tutorials?
  3. What was your view of the Lightning Session of 1-minute paper presentations?
  4. What was your impression of the poster session?
  5. What was your impression of the UC-Davis Conference Ctr as a venue for MICRO? 6. What was your impression of Davis / Sacramento as a venue for MICRO?
  6. How was the organization of MICRO?
  7. After MICRO is done, what is your preferred method to access MICRO papers?
  8. What is your preferred medium for reading MICRO papers after the conference?
  9. Please provide any other comments

The main sentiments were:

• Most had positive views and thought conference was well run.

• Lightning session was good, but very long.
• Posters were too crowded and noisy.
• Tutorials and workshops were well received.

• Davis & Conference Center was not as popular as 2012 Vancouver. • Distance between parallel sessions was too far.
• Food – mixed quality and not enough.
• Long lines for food and not enough places to sit.

• Shuttle service appreciated.
• Diverse preferences for accessing papers after conference.

Check out the Complete Survey.

And surveys from prior years.